And you know what? It actually surprisingly turned out looking pretty good? Like here is the point totals for unranked lists: Okay looking good for ranked lists, but what about unranked lists? Well, my first idea was to just give an unranked list of x games points in the x ranking. Any number below 10 get’s a fair percentage (ex.Top 100’s having more influence than top 10 (91 more points), but they’re spread out over 90 titles.Top 10’s get the bulk of the potential points (96% of top 12).First place a distinct advantage (20% of top 10).Mario Kart 8 even came out this decade, so it all fits! So the point values will be as follows:Īny game that is positioned below 12 gets the same points as twelve (basically a pity point for showing up). It’s a well tested formula used to give first place a competitive edge, but not give each position behind it an insurmountable climb to first. Yes… Yes of course! Mario Kart has been balancing a system of doling out points for 8 and 12 player races for decades. There’s no way to make Mario Party systems work with this data. Lists smaller than 10 still having influenceĪ fair and accurate system… a fair and accurate system… a system that shows a game fairly and accurately… a system that fairly and accurately shows a game’s worth… a system that fairly and accurately shows a game’s skill….Large lists like Top 100’s not having too much influence.Unranked lists still giving points to each game that were relevant.Top 10 lists with each rank having a different weight.And I needed one that worked across four major scenarios: Or, more accurately, a weighting system that my own biases and values deemed as fair and accurate to judge the data. Like all ranking systems, I needed a fair and accurate weighting system that could be used to judge the data.
#Most anticipated ps4 games of 2016 how to
But before I started, to keep it impartial, I needed to figure out how to do it, I’d need to figure out THE ALGORITHM And I’d bring the people’s voices into it too! Not through manipulatable user review scores, but from their own voice on the topic: through forums, blogs, youtube videos, and the lists on this fair site. I’d make my own list, using my own algorithm, using my own sources. What about the indie darlings and the cult classics? What about the mobile hits and the niche simulation games with arcane mechanics? There was a “ranking” of the games based on how many times each game was mentioned in those lists, but…ĭon’t get me wrong, the list probably had what the popular opinion would be the top 20 games of the last decade, but it was so… sterile… so… safe. The thought I got was when I read Metacritic's Best of the 2010's feature, showcasing not just how broken their own system is and how tastes have rapidly changed in the past ten years, but also a list of publications decade top ten lists.
Pretty sure Jeremy Medina knows that feeling all too well… Sometimes you sit down and you have an idea and it's a stupid thing to follow through with it, but you do it anyway and you can't explain why.
0 kommentar(er)
